Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103414 (ALL)

SUNIL UPADHYAY v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/34077/2024 · 2025-01-31

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14522-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34077 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sunil Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sitaram Patel,Vinkesh Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Deoria in considering the application/representation of the petitioner dated September 16, 2024. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Deoria (District Level Committee) should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application/representation of the petitioner dated September 16, 2024. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Deoria (District Level Committee) is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application/representation of the petitioner dated September 16, 2024 within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Dev/- (Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad