Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10341 (JHR)

ABHISHEK KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3105/2025 · 2025-04-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:11793] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. 3105 of 2025 Abhishek Kumar, aged about 31 years, Son of Amit Kumar Sanu @ Sanjay Prasad, Resident of Village-Lalbag, P.O.-Dumrawan, P.S.-Deepnagar, District-Nalanda, Bihar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah , Adv. For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo , Addl. PP 02 / 21.04.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mahuda P.S. Case No. 38 of 2021 instituted under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted Bolero pick up van. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and there is no allegation against the petitioner of committing robbery rather the allegation is against the petitioner of using the stolen vehicle. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 28.01.2025, as mentioned in para 12 of this bail application and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM, Dhanbad in connection with Mahuda P.S. Case No. 38 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-