Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103405 (ALL)

SHARAT SINHA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/15260/2025 · 2025-10-09

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15260 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Dinesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "A. Issue a writ orders or directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to pay 7% interest upon the belated payment of leave encashment amount for the period of 5 years and 3 months within the time fixed by this Court. B. Issue a writ orders or directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2025 shown as Annexure-2 to this writ petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has moved representation before the competent authority, for redressal of his grievance, but nothing has been done till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to take decision on the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that he has no objection in case a fresh representation is moved by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 Director, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sheetla Sahai Srivastava, Siddhartha Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Dinesh Kumar Rai Sharat Sinha .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) H.R. Corporate, Registered Office, I.T.I. Bhawan Durbani Nagar, Banglore, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 10, 2025 Rahul. WRIA No. 15260 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad