Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103395 (ALL)

VIJAY MUKHIYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/34992/2025 · 2025-10-06

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34992 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Shri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority"). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent Authority to issue vending license to the petitioner in pursuance of Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (in short "the Act"). 3. Learned counsel for the Authority submits that the grievance of the petitioner can be addressed by the Chief Legal Officer/ Chairman of the Redressal Committee appointed under the Act and the petitioner may press his claim before the said authority. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of with observation that in case the petitioner moves fresh representation ventilating his grievances before the Chief Legal Officer/ Chairman of the Redressal Committee within ten days, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within six weeks, thereafter, but certainly after giving opportunity to all the stake holders in the matter. October 7, 2025 SP/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeraj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Vijay Mukhiya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad