Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10338 (ALL)

RAM BACHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/2338/2025 · 2025-02-10

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:19745 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2338 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Bachan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurabh Srivastava,Ram Mani Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to call for the records of the case and to quash the order dated 18.12.2024 passed by respondent no.2 dismissing the appeal no.1580 of 2024 (Ram Bachan Vs. Smt. Savita and others) filed by the petitioner and confirming the orders dated 29.12.2023 and 19.06.2024 passed by respondent no. 3 (annexure no.1,2 & 3 to the writ petition)." 3. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that order under challenge in this writ petition has been passed under Section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and is revisable under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Since alternative remedy is available to the petitioner of filing revision, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo stat copy of the same. Order Date :- 11.2.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad