HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35000 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Patel learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Manish Mehrotra learned counsel for the respondent bank. 2. Present petition has been filed against the order dated 04.9.2025 passed by respondent No. 2 i.e. Authorised Officer of the private banking company under Section 13(3-A) of SARFAESI Act 2002. 3. At the outset Sri Mehrotra learned counsel would object that writ petition is not maintainable against the private banking company. Second, it has been submitted that adequate statutory remedies are available to the petitioners under SARFAESI Act. 4. Preliminary objections raised are well founded. Accordingly, interference claimed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is declined. Writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue their statutory remedy in accordance with law. October 7, 2025 Faraz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Patel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sushant (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) M/S Pasha Medical Store And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad