[2025:RJ-JP:11026] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3419/2025 Dr. Naresh Kumar Saxena S/o Late Shri A.k. Saxena, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 91/15, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandary, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Joint Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandary, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Director, Directorate Of Animal Husbandary, Jaipur. 4. Dr. Krishan Kumar Morya, Presently Posted On Deputation At Directorate Gopalan Lalkothi, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishi Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 11/03/2025 1. The present petition is filed assailing the impugned transfer order dated 15.01.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur and the impugned order dated 24.02.2025 whereby the learned RAT without considering the facts and circumstances of the case has dismissed the appeal bearing No.999/2025, preferred by the petitioner/applicant. 2. Heard and considered and perused the material placed on record. 3. Upon considering the aforementioned, this Court is of the view that the learned Tribunal has duly considered the vital [2025:RJ-JP:11026] (2 of 2) [CW-3419/2025] aspects of the present matter and has passed a detailed order. Nevertheless, it is settled position of law that transfers are incidence of service and cannot be avoided. Accordingly, reliance is ought to be placed upon the ratios encapsulated in Mrs. Shilpi Bose and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar reported in AIR 1991 SC 532 and Rajendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2009) 15 SCC 178. Thence, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the instant matter. For the sake of convenience, the opinion spelled out in the order dated 24.02.2025, passed by the learned Tribunal is reproduced herein below: “10- mijksDr foospuk ds vk/kkj ij ge vihykFkhZ ds LFkkukUrj.k vkns’k esa gLr{ksi djuk mfpr ugha ikrs gSA ifj.kkeLo:i ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkhZ }kjk izR;FkhZ foHkkx ds le{k vius inLFkkiu@LFkkukarj.k ds laca/k esa vH;kosnu izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks izR;FkhZ foHkkx ml ij lgkuqHkwfriwoZd fopkj djsa ,oa vk[;kRed vkns’k vH;kosnu izLrqr gksus dh fnukad ls vf/kdre 30 fnol dh vof/k esa ikfjr djsaA blds lkFk gh izR;FkhZ foHkkx dks ;g Hkh funsZ’k fn;s tkrs gSa fd ;fn vihykFkhZ Lo;a }kjk viuk LFkkukUrj.k ugha pkgk x;k gS rks vihykFkhZ dks fu;ekuqlkj Vh-,-@Mh-,- dk Hkqxrku fd;k tk;sA ” 4. In view of the foregoing, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/158