Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10337 (JHR)

KESHRI ARVIND KESHRI ALIAS ARVIND KESHRI ALIAS KESHRI ARVIND KRISHNA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3107/2025 · 2025-04-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:11849 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3107 of 2025 ------ Keshri Arvind Keshri @ Arvind Keshri @ Keshri Arvind Krishna, aged about 24 years, son of Sanjay Kumar Keshri, Resident of Village Bank Colony Pakur, P.O. Pakur, P.S. Pakur Town, District –Pakur. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 21.04.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.281 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 7 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 303 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 whereby cognizance has been taken under Section 303(2)/317(2)/317(4)/317(5)/313 & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of motorcycle of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because he was loitering near the motorcycle of the informant. It is then submitted that co-accused person from whose possession the stolen motorcycle was recovered, has been released on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.02.2025, passed in B.A. No. 959 of 2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.11.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the facts of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Pakur, in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.281 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 7 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/