Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10335 (UTT)

ARIF AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/926/2024 · 2025-03-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.926 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners instead of removing the defects, as pointed out by the Registry, wants to withdraw the writ petition. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.03.2025 SK