KISHAN CHAND AND 8 OTHERS v. SATWANT SINGH AND 50 OTHERS
A227/12284/2025 · 2025-10-06
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12284 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed by counsel for the petitioners today, is taken on record.
2. This petition has been filed for the following relief:-
"A.to issue directios, restraining the defendants-respondents from further alienating the suit property or creating any 3rd party right or changing the nature of land of Khasra No.109M, situated at Village Namoli, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Sadar, District Gautam Budh Nagar, and to maintain status quo over the property with regard to possession and raising constructions during pendency of the present petition."
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that in a suit, an application for interim injunction was filed, which was not decided and therefore, the plaintiff-petitioners approached this Court and this Court by
order dated 18.06.2025 directed for expeditious disposal of the interim injunction application within a period of three months. It has been further contended by counsel for the petitioners that after the order was passed by this Court, the defendants have sold out the properties and the injunction application filed by the petitioners is still pending.
4. The petitioners have not apprised these facts to the trial court by moving an application.
5. In view thereof, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manu Saxena, Radhamani Saxena Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ayub Khan Kishan Chand And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Satwant Singh And 50 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to move an appropriate application for redressal of their grievances bringing all the facts before the trial court. In case, such an application is moved within one week from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned within next two weeks.
7. This order has been passed in presence of Sri Anupam Kulshrestra,
learned counsel for the respondent, who has assured that his client will co-operate in early disposal of the application to be moved by the petitioners as well as injunction application. October 7, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 12284 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad