Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103344 (MAD)

X AUNT OF THE VICTIM CHILD v. The State rep by The Inspector of police

CRL MP/17825/2025 · 2025-10-06

T V Thamilselvi

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 AND CRL A NO. 305 OF 2025 1. X Aunt Of The Victim Child W/O.Xxx, Kayathur, Vikiravandi Psl, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. 2. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O.Nadesan, Kayathur, Vikiravandi Psl, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. 3. LAKSHMI W/o.Krishnamurthy, Kayathur, Vikiravandi Psl, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State rep by The Inspector of police The State Represented By The Inspector Of Police, Thirukkanur Circle, Puducherry. Crime No.92/2019 Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 CRL A No. 305 of 2025 1. X Aunt Of The Victim Child W/o.Xxx, Kayathur, Vikiravandi Psl, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. 2.KRISHNAMURTHY S/o.Nadesan, Kayathur, Vikiravandi Psl, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. 3.LAKSHMI W/o.Krishnamurthy, Kayathur, Vikiravandi Psl, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The State Represented By The Inspector Of Police, Thirukkanur Circle, Puducherry. Crime No.92/2019 Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 PRAYER To condone the delay of 107 days in filing the petition to set aside the order of dismissed for non prosecution passed by this Honble Court in above Criminal Appeal No.305 of 2025 and decide the same on merits. CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): M/s.C.D.Modhi K.Arunagiri S.K.Mohamed Arif G. Praveena https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 M. Praveen For Respondent(s): Public Prosecutor For Puducherry ORDER This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 107 days in filing the petition to set aside the order of dismissed for non prosecution passed by this Court in above Criminal Appeal No.305 of 2025 and decide the same on merits. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to lack of communication between the petitioner and her counsel the petitioner was not able to contest the case. Hence, he prays to allow this petition. 3. The learned Government Advocate raised objection to allow this petition. 4. The reason assigned by the petitioner for delay is justifiable. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. 06-10-2025 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Note : Post the matter on 28.10.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl CRL MP No. 17825 of 2025 AND CRL A NO. 305 OF 2025 06-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis