CRM-M-53649-2025 1 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on : 26.09.2025 CRM-M-53649-2025 Sahibaaj Singh @ Vansh ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CRM-M-53720-2025 Manpreet Singh @ Raja ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present : Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, DAG, Punjab. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J.(Oral) This order will dispose of above said two petitions as both of them have arisen out of same FIR. Brief facts of case have been taken from CRM-M-53649-2025. 2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking concession of regular bail in case FIR No.111 dated 01.08.2025 under Section 21, 27(A) of NDPS Act, 1985 (Section 29 of NDPS Act added later on) registered at Police Station Chattiwind District Amritsar Rural. 3. As per the case of prosecution, during patrolling duty, the police party apprehended three persons namely Jatin @ Thela, Manpreet Singh@ Raja and Sahibaaj Singh @ Vansh, who were standing together, on the basis of suspicion. During search, recovery of only Rs.270/- was effected from the SONIA BURA 2025.09.26 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-53649-2025 2 petitioner Sahibaaj Singh while recovery of heroin weighing 10 grams each was effected from Manpreet Singh @ Raja and Jatin @ Thela. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner does not suffer from any criminal antecedents. He further contends that no contraband was recovered from the petitioner-Sahibaaj Singh @ Vansh. He further contends that the investigation in the case in hand is at the initial stage and the contraband recovered from Manpreet Singh @ Raja is of intermediate quantity. 5. The aforesaid facts were not disputed by learned counsel for the State. 6. Keeping in view the nature of allegations levelled and the recovery effected and the fact that the investigation in the case in hand is at initial stage, I deem it appropriate to allow the present petitions. The petitioners are ordered to be admitted to regular bail subject to their furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. 7. It is made clear that the petitioners shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witness in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observations made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 26.09.2025 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SONIA BURA 2025.09.26 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document