HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15105 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Shri S.N. Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Shri Prem Shankar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 6. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to the seventh respondent. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that she is the permanent resident of Village Semri Tarhar, Post Naudhiya Tarhar, Block Shankargarh, Tehsil Bara, District Prayagraj and she belongs to SC category and she does not possess any land holding and the income certificate issued is of Rs. 4,500/- per month. An advertisement came to be published on 15.10.2024 issued by the D.P.O., Prayagraj for filling up vacancy of Aganbadi worker. The writ petitioner alongwith other and the seventh respondent applied, however, the select list came to be published wherein seventh respondent has been selected. Allegation of the writ petitioner is that seventh respondent possess three bighas land and she does not come under below poverty line and on IGRS complaint, a report came to be submitted on 19.08.2025 that the annual income of the seventh respondent is over and above the limit. 4. Prayer in the present writ petition is to make a proper inquiry in respect of the income certificate issued to the seventh respondent and to decide the representation dated 05.09.2025. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Shivendra Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sunita Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, submits that whenever any complaint is lodged then it is the policy of the State Government to conduct inquiry in that regard. 6. Looking into the overall fact situation, this Court without dwelling into the matter does not think it appropriate to pass any order except to the fact that it would be suffice that in case the State Government through is instrumentalities are of the opinion that the matter requires inquiry then the inquiry be conducted strictly in accordance with law as per the rules in that regard. 7. With the said observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 7, 2025 A. V. Singh WRIA No. 15105 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad