APHC010117182022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6670/2022 Between: 1. AGASTI SRIMANARAYANA, S/O KOTESWAR RAO AGE 45 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURAL R/O MUNJALURU VILLAGE BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P. 2. AGASTI VEERA SAMPOORNA, D/O KOTESWAR RAO AGE 43 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURAL R/O MUNJALURU VILLAGE BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, REGIONAL OFFICER OF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PLOT NO.21, TEACHERS' COLONY, GURUNANAK NAGAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA - 520 008 (ANDHRA PRADESH). 4. THE ADDITIONAL JOINT COLLECTOR/ARBITRATOR NHAI, KRISHNA DIVISION ANDHRA PRADESH. COLLECTRATE OFFICE, AT MACHILIPATNAM, A.P 5. THE THASILDAR, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, AT BANTUMILLI 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.6670 of 2022 KRISHNA DISTRICT , ANDHRA PRADESH 6. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 7. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, MUNJALURU VILLAGE BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P. 8. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, MUNJALURU VILLAGE BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P. 9. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 10. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF THE POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM RURAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.A.P. 11.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER BANTUMILLI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P 11. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BANTUMILLI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.6670 of 2022 The Court made the following Order:- Mr. M.S.P. Reddy, the learned counsel representing Mr. Dr. Challa Srinivasa Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause survives in this writ petition. 2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 13.08.2025 PGT