Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10327 (GAU)

SMT KALPANA DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/1969/2025 · 2025-09-04

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010071002025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1969/2025 SMT KALPANA DAS W/O SRI ROBIN DAS, R/O VIP ROAD, WARD NO. 15, P.O., P.S. AND DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786125 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ASSAM DISPUR GUWWAHATI-6 ASSAM 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 4:THE TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD TINSUKIA DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-78612 Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MS M NIROLA,MR. A K GUPTA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER 05.09.2025 Heard Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. M. Chetia, learned Government Advocate, Assam and Mr. S.S. Roy, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5 are also present. 2. Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner having realized that no appeal has been filed as required under the provisions of Section 233 of Assam Municipal Act, 1956, fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file an appeal before the appropriate authority as per the provisions of law. 3. The prayer for withdrawal is allowed. 4. This writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal, with liberty as prayer for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant