APHC010180112020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NOs: 11516 of 2020 & 6834 of 2021 WRIT PETITION NO: 11516 of 2020: Between: 1. A CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O BHEEMALINGA, AGED 5 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 3/34, BC COLONY, MANEKURTHI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. A.SOMASEKHAR, S/O BHEEMALINGA, AGED 4 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 3/34, BC COLONY, MANEKURTHI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADONI DIVISION, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ALUR MANDAL, AT ALUR KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. SRI AYYALAPPA SWAMY DEVUDU, MANEKURTHI VILLAGE, ALOOR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. RAMAKOTI REDDY S/O LATE VENKATRAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O H.NO.1/65, HALAHARVI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 HBKM,J W.P.Nos.11516 of 2020 & 6834 of 2021 6. VISHNUVARDHAN REDDY S/O LATE VENKATRAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O A.GONEHAL VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY S/O LATE RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O A.GONEHAL VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. GUDI NARENDRA S/O PEDA ERANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.2-16-1, MANEKURTHI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. RR 5 TO7 AND 8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.28.07.2025 IN I.A.NO.02 OF 2020 AND I.A.NO.01 OF 2022 RESPECTIVELY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SARVOTHAM REDDY 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. B SARVOTHAM REDDY 4. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.6834 of 2021: Between: 1. A CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O. BHEEMALINGA, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, MINOR REP. BY THEIR NATURAL MOTHER AND GUARDIAN SMT. A. HYMAVATHI, W/O. BHEEMALING, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O. H. NO.3/34, BC. COLONY, MANEKURTHI VILLAGE, AALURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. K. SOMASEKHAR,, S/O.BHEER TIALINGA, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, MINOR, REP. BY THEIR NATURAL MOTHER AND GUARDIAN SMT. A. HYMAVATHI, W/O. BHEEMALING, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O. H. NO.3/34, BC. COLONY, MANEKURTHI VILLAGE, AALURU 3 HBKM,J W.P.Nos.11516 of 2020 & 6834 of 2021 MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADONI DIVISION, ADONI TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, AALURU MANDAL, AALUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. SRI SRI AYYALAPPA SWAMYDEVUDU, MANEKURTHI VILLAGE,AALURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. B SARVOTHAM REDDY 4 HBKM,J W.P.Nos.11516 of 2020 & 6834 of 2021 The Court made the following Common Order:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and the learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents. 2. The W.P.No.11516 of 2020 was filed questioning the orders of the 2nd respondent in Rc.E.2185/2020 dated 23.06.2020 directing the 3rd respondent to cancel the entries made in the revenue records as well as in the pattadar pass book and title deeds with respect to the lands in Sy.No.27/A to an extent of 4.59 cents, in Sy.No.27/B to an extent of Ac.0.60 cents, in Sy.No.27/C to an extent of Ac.3.38 cents and in Sy.No.27/D to an extent of Ac.1.09 cents, totaling to an extent of Ac.9.66 cents of Manikurthi Village, Alur Mandal, Kurnool District. 3. The W.P.No.6834 of 2021 was filed questioning the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representation/appeal preferred by the petitioners against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer in RCE 2185/2020 dated 23.06.2020. 4. All the counsels representing the parties in both the cases submit that since the revision is pending before the 2nd respondent in W.P.No.6834 of 2021, against the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer in RCE 2185/2020 dated 23.06.2020 the said revision may be directed to be disposed of. 5 HBKM,J W.P.Nos.11516 of 2020 & 6834 of 2021 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and upon common statement made by all the counsels, both the writ petitions are disposed of directing the 2nd respondent in W.P.No.6834 of 2021 to dispose of the revision pending before it, if not already disposed of, against the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer in RCE 2185/2020 dated 23.06.2020, as expeditiously as possible strictly in accordance with law preferably within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of this order. 6. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 11.08.2025 PGT