Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10326 (UTT)

RANI ADHIKARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1927/2021 · 2025-03-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2082 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1930 of 2021 With WPCRL No.1927 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Rishabh Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, learned counsel for petitioners. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painuli and Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holders for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. By means of these criminal writ petitions, petitioners have challenged the FIR No.204 of 2021 dated 11.09.2021 registered with P.S. Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar under Sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 341, 353, 354(A), 332, 504, 506 and 34 IPC. 4. It is contended by the learned State Counsel that after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted by the police on 20.01.2022 against both the petitioners, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in these writ petitions and it become infructuous. 5. The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, these criminal writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. However, a liberty is given to petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 24.03.2025 PN