VINOD MITTAL S/O SH. OM PRAKASH JAIN v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
CW/4983/2023 · 2025-04-22
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10324 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10324 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4983/2023 Vinod Mittal S/o Sh. Om Prakash Jain, F-157-158-159, Industrial Area, Kekri (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus The Registrar Of Trade Marks, (Govt. Of India) Near Chanakyapuri Overbridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.D. Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Digvijay Singh for Mr. Ashish Kumar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 22/04/2025
1. A limited prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner for issuing a direction to the Registrar, Trade Mark to decide the application filed by the petitioner expeditiously within a time frame.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that an application was submitted by the petitioner for getting the trade mark registered before the Registrar in the year 2020 but inspite of passing of considerable time, till date, the said application has not been decided by him by passing a reasoned and speaking order, therefore appropriate direction be issued to the Registrar.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer but he is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.
(2 of 2) [CW-4983/2023]
4. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands disposed of by issuing a direction to the Registrar, Trade Mark to decide the application (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the Registrar to decide the application in a particular way, he would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/41