HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12214 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to amend the prayer clause of the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "kindly direct the learned appellate court, i.e. Additional District Judge (I), Mathura to expedite the Misc. Case No.11 of 2015 (Nannu Ram Vs. Smt. Chandrakanta & 32 Ors.) under Order 39 Rule 2(A) of C.P.C., arising out of order dt.28.01.2013 passed by Additional District Judge, Mathura in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 92 of 2010 (Nannu Ram Vs. Smt. Chandrakanta & 4 Ors.), within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2015, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Additional District Judge - I, Mathura, to decide the above-mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akash Singh, Shivam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Nannuram .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Chandrakanta And 32 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad