HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12148 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "(a)-To directing the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sharki, Prayagraj to decide the 6C application in Suit No. 1020 of 2025 (Swami Shivanand @ Shivakant Tripathi versus Jitendra Singh and others), pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sharki, Prayagraj expeditiously with in stipulated time." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sharki, Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Rai, Om Prakash Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Swami Shivanand Maharaj @ Shivakant Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) Jitendra Singh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad