HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33793 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sheshadri Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Vipin Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the chargesheet/police report No. 1 of 2022 dated 20.11.2022 in Case Crime No. 265 of 2022 under sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Prem Nagar, District Bareilly as well as the cognizance/summoning order dated 25.10.2023 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2 in Case No. 789 of 2023. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on record. It is further submitted that the injuries received by the injured are muscle deep and are not dangerous to life. It is also submitted that there is a cross case also pending in which the applicants also received injuries. It is further submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicants and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicants. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and the injuries caused to the injured are not dangerous to life, keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sheshadri Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vipin Chandra Pandey Mohd Enam @ Enam Ali 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the case of Naushey Ali & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another, 2025 INSC 182, and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Case No. 789 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 265 of 2022 under sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Prem Nagar, District Bareilly are hereby quashed. 7. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 19, 2025 Madhurima A482 No. 33793 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad