HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12158 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i.Direct the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to decide the 6C application dated 01.11.2023 filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of C.P.C. in Original Suit No.755 of 2023 (Surendra Kumar and others Vs. Ikrar & Others), expeditiously, within a time bound period as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court preferably within a period of one month." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nipun Singh, Parijat Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Ikrar .....Petitioner(s) Surendra Kumar And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad