HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8201 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J. 1-Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2-This Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application has been preferred by the applicant after rejection of his anticipatory bail application by order dated 03.04.2025 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge/F.T.C.-II, Deoria seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 522 of 2024, under Sections 64, 351(3), 352, 79 BNS, Police Station Salempur, District Deoria. 3-On the matter being taken up, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, upon instructions, pointed out that apart from the present case, the applicant has criminal history of following four other criminal cases : (i) Case Crime No. 228 of 2016, under Sections 379, 411, 420 IPC, Police Station Salempur, District Deoria, (ii) Case Crime No. 249 of 2016, under Sections 379, 411, 414, 420 IPC, Police Station Salempur, District Deoria, (iii) Case Crime No. 278 of 2016, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters Act, Police Station Salempur, District Deoria, (iv) Case Crime No. 6999 of 2016, under Sections 411, 420 IPC, Police Station Salempur, District Deoria. 4-In response, learned counsel for the applicant could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5-Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I find that learned counsel for the applicant is not in a position to controvert the aforesaid submissions of learned A.G.A. The Supreme Court in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rudresh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Monu Madheshiya .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) case of Dalip Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others, (2010) 2 SCC 114 came down heavily on unscrupulous litigants by holding that it is now well established that a litigant who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. 6-In view of the above, this Court finds that the applicant has not come before this Court with clean hands as he has suppressed his actual criminal history, which is one of the essential factors for consideration of anticipatory bail, therefore, I am not inclined to exercise my discretionary power to grant benefit of anticipatory bail in favour of the applicant. 7-Accordingly, the instant application U/s 482 B.N.S.S. is rejected. October 8, 2025 Shubham NABAIL No. 8201 of 2025 2 (Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM KUMAR AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad