Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103173 (ALL)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/35055/2025 · 2025-10-06

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35055 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (respondent no.4). 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authority to execute the lease deed in favour of the petitioner immediately. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner's land in Khasra Nos.664 ad 757 total area 1.937 hectare situated at Village Patawari, Pargana and Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, was acquired by the State Government and the declaration under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was made on 21.09.1995. Under the rehabilitation scheme framed by the respondents, 6% developed plot, being Plot no.118, Pocket-A area 390 square meters, was allotted to him on 04.06.2021 but till date the lease deed of the aforesaid plot has not been executed in his favour. So far as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, he has already filed a representation dated 06.06.2023 before the respondent no.4 for redressal of his grievance, which is still pending. He has confined his prayer only to the relief that his representation dated 06.06.2023 may be considered by the appropriate authority. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the said prayer. 5. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Singh Yadav, Gautam Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. Rajendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally giving liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the competent authority within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is moved within the said period, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within next four weeks, in case there is no other impediment in the matter. October 7, 2025 RKP WRIC No. 35055 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad