Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:36974
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1685 of 2023 Smt. Manju Gayakwad W/o Late Narendra Rao Gayakwad Aged About 43 Years Resident Of Ward No.15, Basti, Behind Saripali School, Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Development Commissioner Chhattisgarh, Vikas Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Thakur Pyarelal Panchayat And Rural Development Institute (S.I.R.D.), Nimora, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Principal Regional Panchayat And Rural Development Training Centre, Kurud, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Dhamtari, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate For State : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 29/07/2025 1 Heard Ms. Priyanka Rai, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Abhishek Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.07.29 19:03:02 +0530
2 2 The petitioner has filed this petition with the following prayers:-
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take time bound decision over the claim of compassionate appointment made by the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide employment to the petitioner on compassionate basis on any suitable post. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit and appropriate.” 3 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if exigency so arises as during the pendency of this petition, the authorities have passed the order on merits while rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdraw with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Yogesh