Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103155 (PNJ)

RAJWINDER SINGH GADDU v. TEJVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER

COCP/3641/2023 · 2025-01-17

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAJWINDER SINGH GA TEJVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. N.P.S. Mann, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. HARKESH MANUJ Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Joshi, Sr. Assistant submits that the salary of the petitioner for the last two months shall be deposited in his account within a period of two days from today and the GIS benefits sh period of ten days. In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 17.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAJWINDER SINGH GADDU Versus TEJVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. N.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Joshi, Sr. Assistant submits that the salary of the petitioner for the last two months shall be deposited in his account within a period of two days from today and the GIS benefits shall be released to him within a period of ten days. In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done wi aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3641-2023 Date of Decision: January 17, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Mukesh Joshi, Sr. Assistant submits that the salary of the petitioner for the last two months shall be deposited in his account within a period of two all be released to him within a In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of /her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No January 17, 2025 Mukesh Joshi, Sr. Assistant submits that the salary of the petitioner for the last two months shall be deposited in his account within a period of two all be released to him within a In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the thin the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of /her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.18 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document