Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103108 (ALL)

PRIYANKA PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/14951/2025 · 2025-10-12

Vikas Budhwar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14951 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prashant Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that his father, late Mighawa Prajapati @ Meghraj Prajapati was posted as Lekhakar in the office of Panchayat Raj, Account, Hamirpur who expired on 01.05.2021 in harness. The writ petitioner claiming himself to be eligible and applied for compassionate appointment on 01.06.2021 though the file of the writ petitioner for compassionate appointment is running pillar to post but no orders have been passed. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the third respondent to consider the claim of the writ petitioner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is for compassionate appointment needs examined at the instance by the third respondent. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the third respondent who shall on the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Balbeer Singh, Rajesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Priyanka Prajapati .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. 7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 13, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 14951 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad