HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34997 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Ms. Ishita Sand holding brief of Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority"). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent authority to sanction lease plan and deliver the possession of plot in question in pursuance of reservation letter dated 5.2.2025 in favour of the petitioners and for a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 15.9.2025 within stipulated period. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of asking respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law expeditiously. October 7, 2025 SP/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Rahul Yadav And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad