` CWP-28474-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CWP-28474-2025 Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 Lovish Luna …Petitioner Versus Local Audit Department, Chandigarh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Harsh Rathi, Advocate, Ms. Sangeeta Choudhary, Advocate, Ms. Nikita Jangra, Advocate and Mr. Sehaj Singh Bhullar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Maheshinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate and Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for respondent-U.T. Chandigarh (through video conferencing) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to consider and decide his representation dated 14.07.2025 (Annexure P-8). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that grievance of the petitioner would be redressed if respondent is directed to consider and pass an appropriate order on his representation dated 14.07.2025. 3. Mr. Maheshinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of the respondent, assures the Court that competent authority would consider petitioner’s claim and pass an appropriate order within four weeks from today. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.22 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. ` CWP-28474-2025 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that petition has been disposed of in the wake of statement of both sides and no opinion has been expressed by this Court with respect to jurisdiction of this Court or Central Administrative Tribunal. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 22.09.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.22 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.