LT COL (RETD) SUDHIR JUNG RANA v. BHUPINDER PATHAK
RSA/487/2015 · 2025-06-18
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10310 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10310 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1387 of 2008 a/w
RSA Nos. 444, 445, 476, 486
and 487 of 2015
Decided on 18th June 2025 CWP No.1387 of 2008 Lt. Col. Sudhir Jung Rana
…Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Himachal Pradesh and others
…Respondents _________________________________________________ RSA No.444 of 2015 Lt. Col. (Retd.) Sudhir Jung Rana
…Appellant Versus Sh. Vineet Sharma and others
…Respondents RSA No.445 of 2015 Lt. Col. (Retd.) Sudhir Jung Rana
…Appellant Versus Sh. Upender Pathak and others
…Respondents RSA No.476 of 2015 Lt. Col. (Retd.) Sudhir Jung Rana
…Appellant Versus Sh. Ravinder Nath Pathak and others
…Respondents RSA No.486 of 2015 Lt. Col. (Retd.) Sudhir Jung Rana
…Appellant Versus Col. Pradeep Kumar and others
…Respondents
2 RSA No.487 of 2015 Lt. Col. (Retd.) Sudhir Jung Rana
…Appellant Versus Sh. Bhupender Pathak and others
…Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate,
with Mr. Ajeet Pal, Advocate, for the
petitioners, in all the petition/appeals.
For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the respective respondents, in all the petition/appeals.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
When these cases were taken up for consideration today, record demonstrates that no steps till date have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of late sole petitioner/appellant. Learned Senior Counsel further on instructions submits that despite the best endeavor of the instructing counsel, no instructions are coming forth.
3
2.
In these circumstances, this Court has no option but to close all these proceedings on account of abatement. Ordered accordingly.
3.
Proceedings are closed as abated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
June 18, 2025 (Vinod)