MADARSA ARABIA SAKLAINIA JAMEUL BANAT v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/34787/2025 · 2025-10-06
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34787 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri S.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for respondents.
2. Petitioner has rushed this Court without making an application before concerned respondents to allow to run the Madarsa if it has requisite permission, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of reserving a liberty to petitioner to approach concerned respondents.
3. In case any application is filed by petitioner, the concerned respondents will consider and decide the same in accordance with law. October 7, 2025 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Singh Chandel, Sushil Kumar Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Madarsa Arabia Saklainia Jameul Banat .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad