Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10306 (AP)

Bobbadi Ramalaxmi, v. Acharya Ranga Agrl.Uni., State of A.P.,

WP/5114/2018 · 2025-03-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCK^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAJ WRIT PETITION NO: 5114 OF 2018 qiv O Between: Ji. Bobbadi Ramalaxmi, W/o Krishna Rao, aged aout 41 years, Occ.Casual Labourer, Naira (Village and Post), Srikakulam Rural Mandal and District - 532185 2. Parla Eswaramma, W/o Surayya, aged about 48 years, Occ. Casual Labourer, Naira (Village and Post), Srikakulam Rural Mandal and District - 532185. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. Acharya Ranga Agriculture University, Rep by its Registrar, Guntur District. 2. ^The Principal, Agricultural College, Naira Village and Post, Srikakulam Mandal And District 3. Jhe Vice-chancellor, Acharya Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur District. 4. Jhe District Collector, Srikakulam Town and District. 5. 9ovt. of A.P. rep by its. Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the may k - nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not ^ ^ ^ as 01-07-1976 and 01-07-1969 instead of 01-07-1959 and 01-07-1960 respectively in the records of the 1st respondent University is arbitrary, iilegai and violation of Art 21 of the G^stitution of India. changing the date of birth of petitioners lA NO: 1 OF 201« Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the writ petition, the High Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing - respondent 2 to 4 pending be pleased to direct the respondents to the representations dated.29.08.2017 made to the disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitloner(s):SRI VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: SRI YELLA REDDY FOR ANGRAU) Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5:GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER naidana RAJANALA (SC 1 «> APHC010116742018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5114/2018 Between: Bobbadi Ramalaxmi, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Acharya Ranga AgrI Uni State Of A P and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VIJAYA KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.YELLA REDDY RAJANALA (SC FOR ANGRAU) 3.S PRANATHI 4.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5114/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with / ^ the following prayer for: . “...to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not changing the date of birth of petitioners as 01.07.1976 and 01.07.1969 instead of 01.07.1959 and 01.07.1960 respectively in the records of the 1st respondent University is arbitrary illegal and violation of Art 21 of the Constitution of India and to pass... ” Heard Sri N. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. S. Pranathi, learned Standing counsel for the respondent-Univers ity. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the representations of the petitioners are still pending with the University and the petition may be disposed of giving direction to the respondent-authoritiesto consider the representations according to law. Learned Standing counsel for the respondent-University would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 4. 5. Considering the submissions made, the petition is disposed of. However, the respondent No.3 is directed to dispose of the representations of the petitioners to consider their date of births as 01.07.1976 and 01.07.1969 instead of 01.07.1959 and 01.07.1960 respectively and pass orders according to Governing Rules and law and communicate the same to the petitioners. 3 Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. ViJAYA BA3U ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Registrar, Acharya Ranga Agriculture University, Guntur District. 2. The Principal, Agricultural College, Naira Village and Post, Srikakulam Mandal And District 3. The Vice-chancellor, Acharya Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur District. 4. The District Collector, Srikakulam Town and District. 5. The Principal Secretary, Govt, of A.P. Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. OneCCto SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR NAIDANA, Advocate [OPUC] 7r One CC to M/s. S. PRANATHI, Advocate [OPUC] 8' One CC to SRI YELLA REDDY RAJANALA (SC FOR ANGRAU), Advocate [OPUC] 9, Two CCS to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] ip. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] Tf. Three C.D.Copies nm »> HIGH COURT DATED: 19/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5114 of 2018 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS