Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10305 (UTT)

RAKESH THAPAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/922/2024 · 2025-04-22

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.922 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mohd. Umar, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Shariq Khurishid, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State submitted that after investigation, charge- sheet has been submitted against the petitioners on 10.09.2024. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to challenge the charge-sheet in some appropriate proceedings. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. 7. However, it is open to the petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 22.04.2025 Ravi