Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10303 (ALL)

SUHANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/2100/2025 · 2025-03-16

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37731 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2100 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suhani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kanhaiya Mishra,Sandeep Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has handed over a copy of the instructions, the same is taken on record. 2. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel for the State, on the basis of instructions received, submitted that the cause of filing the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad