Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10302 (RAJ)

SUNIL KUMAR SON OF SHRI SURESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3521/2025 · 2025-05-20

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21173] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3521/2025 1. Sunil Kumar Son Of Shri Suresh Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Dalmiya Ki Dhani, Post Aduka, Tehsil Chirawa, Distt. Jhunjhunu-333026 2. Naveen Kumar Son Of Shri Satyaveer Singh, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Ward No.04, Sainik Nagar, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 3. Ankur Janu Son Of Shri Dharmendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Bhamarwasi, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. Bulkesh Kumari D/o Shri Sardar Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Dhayalo Ka Bass, Kari, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 5. Shree Kant Sharma Son Of Shri Vijendra Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Shri Amarpura, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 6. Anil Kumar Singh Son Of Shri Dungar Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Jatoowas, Distt. Churu, Rajasthan 7. Savita Choudhary D/o Manikchand, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Dabari Baloda, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 8. Sanjeev Kumar Son Of Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Gowla, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Jhunjhunu. 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu, Distt. Jhunjhunu. 4. District Medicare Relief Society And Chief Medical Officer, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 5. Chief Medical Officer, Govt. Bhagwan Das Khetan Hospital, Jhunjhunu. 6. M/s Bachan Kumar Mangtu Ram Company, Bapu Basti, Ward No. 20 Jhunjhunu, Through Its Proprietor. [2025:RJ-JP:21173] (2 of 2) [CW-3521/2025] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Pareek with Mr. Lalit Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 20/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this civil writ petition as he has instructions to avail the alternative remedy available under the law for redressal of their grievance(s). The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /22