Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12124 of 2025 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. By means of the present petition under, the petitioner has sought for a suitable direction to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Jaunpur to decide the Complaint Case No. 833 of 2018 within stipulated time.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the complainant in the present matter and had filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. on 22.11.2018 before the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. The said application was treated as a complaint case, and the trial court thereafter proceeded with the trial. Since then, no effective
order has been passed till date. It is submitted that the proceedings have been unduly delayed, causing serious prejudice to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction to the concerned trial court be issued to decide the matter within a specific time frame.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is
disposed of with a direction to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate–IV, Jaunpur to conclude the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 833 of 2018, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. October 7, 2025 A. Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dwarika Prasad Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Rajmani .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad