Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102997 (ALL)

SMT. NAHEDA @ NEHA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/34732/2025 · 2025-10-05

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34732 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.478 of 2025, under Section 87/61(2) BNS, Police Station Kotwali, District Azamgarh, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2025 Shaswat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suneel Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Naheda @ Neha And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad