Dilip Kumar Mandal @ Dilip Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./74687/2025 · 2025-11-25
Harish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102995 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102995 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74687 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Dilip Kumar Mandal @ Dilip Kumar S/o Surendra Kumar Mandal @ Surendra Mandal @ Surendra Prasad Mandal Res OF Village- Barhari, PS- Bhawanipur, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bidhu Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narain Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 25-11-2025 Heard Mr. N. K. Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate representing the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Narain Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS. 3. Allegedly on the instigation made by the petitioner, co-acccused Ranjan Rishi assaulted the informant by means of sickle (chewani) over the abdomen, ribs and head of the informant due to which he sustained serious injury. There is further allegation against other co-accused persons of causing assault. 4. Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner referring to the FIR contended that at best even if the allegation is taken to be true for the sake of argument, the petitioner is said
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74687 of 2025(2) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 to be an order giver and he has not actively participated in the crime leading to any injury to any person; moreover the petitioner bears fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6.
Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note of the accusation against the petitioner, coupled with the fair antecedent, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. Anjani/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T