HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34902 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "(a) To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to protect the property and life of the petitioner. (b) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. (c) Award the cost of the writ petition in faovur of the petitioner." 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has purchased plot in dispute by registered sale deed from respondent nos.5 & 6, and respondent nos.5 & 6 are not giving possession of the plot in dispute to the petitioner. 4. In view of the aforesaid backdrop, the petitioner has prayed for the relief quoted above. 5. The dispute between the petitioner and respondent nos.5 6 is essentially a private dispute, and this Court cannot issue any writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to a private person, and in such view of the fact, the writ petition is not the appropriate remedy. The remedy of the petitioner is before the competent Civil Court under civil law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jagdish Narayan Gupta, Karan Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shiv Poojan .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available under law. October 7, 2025 NS WRIC No. 34902 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad