Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102979 (PNJ)

KIRAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/10264/2025 · 2025-09-19

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP No.10264 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 CRWP No.10264 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision :19.09.2025 Kiran and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Ms. Jyoti Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG, Haryana. SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) : 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their life and liberty from the respondents No.4 to 11. 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) before the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Hisar. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 3 only. 4. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for disposing of the representation (Annexure P-4) be given to the respondent No.2 and that the instant writ petition be disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR 2025.09.19 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRWP No.10264 of 2025 (O&M) 2 6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. 7. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided adequate safety and security to their life and liberty, if required. It is, however, clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of the relationship of the petitioners. The police authority of District Hisar shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 19.09.2025 Manoj Bhutani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.09.19 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document