Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102949 (ALL)

RAMVIR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/34705/2025 · 2025-10-12

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34705 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Sharda Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri A.B. Singhal, learned counsel for Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority. 2. The instant writ petition is preferred with request to issue direction to the respondents to lease back the land of the petitioner in Khata No.4, Khasra No.33, admeasuring an area of 2.4130 hectares, situated at Village Bhatta, District Bautam Buddh Nagar and mutate the name of the petitioner over the said land in place of respondent no.3. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that so far as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, he has already filed a representation dated 13.09.2025 before the respondents for redressal of his grievance, which is still pending. He has confined his prayer only to the relief that his representation dated 13.09.2025 may be considered by the appropriate authority. 4. Per contra, Shri A.B. Singhal, learned counsel for the respondent authority has raised an objection that no such claim can be set up in individual capacity. In case any such consolidated representation is moved by the heirs of the original owner, definitely the same would be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law. 5. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharda Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramvir Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally, giving liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (respondent no.4) within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is moved within the said period, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no.4 in accordance with law within next three months. October 13, 2025 RKP WRIC No. 34705 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad