SULEMAN KHAN AND 12 OTHERS v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/33730/2024 · 2025-09-18
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33730 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. Heard Ms. Zurekha Begum, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Ayub Khan,
learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ehtesham Afsar Khan, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 5544 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 293 of 2023 under sections 147, 323, 336, 341, 452, 427, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Bithri Chanpur, District Bareilly pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly in terms of the compromise dated 02.9.2024.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicants and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicants.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants.
5. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the
facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ayub Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ehtesham Afsar Khan, G.A. Suleman Khan And 12 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 5544 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 293 of 2023 under sections 147, 323, 336, 341, 452, 427, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Bithri Chanpur, District Bareilly pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly are hereby quashed.
7. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 19, 2025 Madhurima A482 No. 33730 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad