- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2257 WP No. 200894 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.200894 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI GOVIND SWAMY S/O NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: DATA ENTRY OPERATOR, NALWAR NADA KACHERI, CHITTAPUR, R/O: H NO 9-352/A/C, ALAND ROAD, NEAR SHETTY COMPLEX, GANDI LAYOUT, SHAHABAZAR, TQ. & DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARUNKUMAR AMARGUNDAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BANGALURU – 01. 2. THE DIRECTOR ATALJI JANASNEHI DIRECTORATE, K. R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 01. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KALABURAGI, DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 101. Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2257 WP No. 200894 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR CHITTAPUR, TQ: CHITTAPUR, DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 211. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.3 & 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 08.08.2023 & 09.08.2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E & E1. B) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.3 & 4 TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER INTO SERVICE AS DATA ENTRY OPERATOR IN THE OFFICE OF RESPONDENT NO.4 I.E NALWR NADA KACHERI IN TERMS OF WORK ORDER/APPOINTMENT ORDER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) Heard Sri.Arunkumar Amargundappa, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate who represents respondents. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2257 WP No. 200894 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed as Data Entry Operator at the office of respondent No.4 in the year 2022. The petitioner was rendering his services continuously without any interruption. However, after one year the petitioner was asked not to attend the office. He was not given any order of termination and no reasons were assigned for denying appointment to the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner submitted number of representations, but respondent Nos.3 and 4 failed to consider those representations and therefore, the present writ petition is filed. Learned counsel submits that no further orders are required except to direct respondent Nos.3 and 4 to consider the representations of the petitioner and to pass necessary orders. 3. Heard learned Additional Government Advocate also in this regard. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2257 WP No. 200894 of 2025 4. Having considered the justification in the relief sought for, the writ petition is disposed of with the following: ORDER i. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are directed to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 08.08.2023 and 09.08.2023 and pass necessary orders within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. ii. The decision taken be communicated to the petitioner. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 77 CT:NI