SRI KODAVATI PRASAD RAO @ KODAVATI PRASADARAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/2984/2025 · 2025-03-20
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10294 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10294 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010117012025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2984/2025 Between: Sri Kodavati Prasad Rao @ Kodavati Prasadarao and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
2
I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2984 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS) has been filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 to 9, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in Crime No.399 of 2024 on the file of Chintalapudi Police Station, Eluru District, for the offences under Sections 69, 88, 318(2),118(1), 351(2) r/w 3(5) BNS. 2. The de facto complainant filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025, duly enclosing a Joint Memo entered between the petitioners as well as de facto complainant. It is stated that at the intervention of elders on both sides, the petitioners and the de facto complainant have arrived at an understanding and the matter has been settled between them. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing for the unofficial respondent No.2 (de facto-complainant) and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing respondent No.1/State are present. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioners herein/Accused Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 9 and 2nd respondent herein are present before this Court. They produced their respective Aadhar cards in proof of their identity. Learned
3
counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for 2nd respondent have identified the parties in the open Court. 5. This Court has questioned 2nd respondent herein/de facto complainant with regard to compromise, and she categorically stated to that extent that she has voluntarily entered into compromise with the petitioners herein/Accused Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 9. This Court is satisfied with the identification of the parties and voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. 6. Since the parties entered into settlement and compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed and therefore, the proceedings in Crime No.399 of 2024 on the file of Chintalapudi Police Station, Eluru District against the petitioners herein/ Accused Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 9 is hereby quashed.
7. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 and Criminal Petition No.2984 of 2025 are allowed. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 20.03.2025 PNS