IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.314 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Naveen Kumar Walia …….Petitioner Versus Sh. R.D.Nazeem & others … Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 10.04.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Divisional Manager, HRTC, Dehra, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, learned counsel representing the respondents states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication, this Court finds that in terms of the judgment/order alleged to have been 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 violated, pay arrears of the petitioner have been paid and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, the present proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 11,2025 (shankar)