Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102918 (ALL)

GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34945/2025 · 2025-10-09

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34945 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohit Kr. Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 195 of 2025, Under Section - 109(1) B.N.S, Police Station - Jhinjhana, District - Shamli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated because of personal enmity with the victim and charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.4.2025. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that there is specific allegation of causing seven injuries with axe which are serious in nature, therefore, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 5. Considering the aforesaid submission and taking into account that specific role has been assigned to the applicant for causing injury to the victim and the injury report itself shows that the victim received seven injuries caused by sharp edged weapon out of which two injuries are dangerous to life, this Court is not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. October 10, 2025 Vandana Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohit Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Gautam .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad