Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102914 (ALL)

SMT. MALTI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/34688/2025 · 2025-10-05

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34688 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 30.07.2025 passed by the respondent no.2 i.e. Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, Lalganj, District Azamgarh passed in Case No. 00797/2020 (Computerized Case No.T-202015060400797 (State Vs. Malti) under section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Annexure No.9); II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.2 not to demolish the house of the petitioner over the land in dispute; III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Restoration Application of the petitioner in Case No. 00797/2020 (Computerized Case No.T-202015060400797 (State Vs. Malti), under section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006;" 2. The first two prayers made in the writ petition cannot be granted as the restoration application is pending consideration in proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the restoration application of petitioner filed in Case No. 00797/2020 (Computerized Case No.T-202015060400797 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bajarang Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Smt. Malti .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) (State vs. Malti), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 6, 2025 V.S.Singh WRIC No. 34688 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad