Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102889 (PNJ)

PAWANVEER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/10231/2025 · 2025-09-22

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-10231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Pawanveer Kaur and another State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of direct nos.2 and 3 interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No. relatives. 2. are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos. apprehend danger from respondent nos. photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P Annexure P 18.09.2025 (Annexure P 3. 4. respondent-State. 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a 10231-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Pawanveer Kaur and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Gurbinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of direct for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos. apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P Annexure P-4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated (Annexure P-5) to respondent no. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10231-2025 Decided on:22.09.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to 6 and their Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to 6. They to 6. Their marriage certificate and photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P-3 and . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. , accepts notice on behalf of the t entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles ions to respondent for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to and their petitioners . They . Their marriage certificate and and . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated , accepts notice on behalf of the t entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a VINOD KUMAR 2025.09.22 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10231 direction to respondent no.2 decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. September 22 vinod* 10231-2025 direction to respondent no.2- Commissioner of Police, District Ludhiana decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by is order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. 22, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Commissioner of Police, District Ludhiana, to 5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by is order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge g/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES , to petitioners and grant them It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by is order would not be understood having expressed any opinion VINOD KUMAR 2025.09.22 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document