AYAZ AHMAD AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/33126/2024 · 2025-02-18
Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102888 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102888 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23949-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33126 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ayaz Ahmad And Another Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bakhteyar Yusuf,Faheem Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Manoj Kumar Singh,Punit Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated June 11, 2024 filed by him.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Lucknow is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad