Palivela Surya Kumari @ Surya Bai, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7079/2020 · 2025-09-11
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10288 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10288 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010116272020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7079/2020 Between:
1. PALIVELA SURYA KUMARI @ SURYA BAI, W/O.LATE P.RANGA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCC:HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.No.58-15-66/1 SHANTI NAGAR, NEAR NAD KOTHA ROAD VISKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICEI, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MVP DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
6. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SHO, MUVVALAVANIPALEM P.S.
VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
7. GUNJI ADISESHU, S/O.GUNJI VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED MAJOR, R/O.53-19-2/1/13 RENUKA NIWAS, CHAITANYA NAGAR MADDELAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
8. GUNJI VENKAYAMMA, W/O.ADISESHU AGED MAJOR, R/O.53- 19-2/1/13 RENUKA NIWAS, CHAITANYA NAGAR MADDELAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
9. HERITAGE HOMES, REP. BY MANAGING PARTNER, SRI R.VICIYA SAGAR S/O.R.D.RAJU, AGED 53 YEARS SITUATED AT FLAT NO.1, GROUND FLOOR
SRINIVASA MANSIONS APARTMENTS, TPT COLONY
SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 to 6 in interfering with the peaceful possessor and enjoyment of the petitioner's land in Sy.No.19/2 to an extent of admeasuring 3298 sq.yards situated at Chinna Waltair Village, Pedda Waltair Area, Visakhapatnam District bounded by East - Land covered by Sy.No.6, West - Boundary wall of Andhra University Hostel, North - Land belong to Kalidindi Rama Devi and 40' feet GVMC Road connecting to 80' feet beach road, South - Land sold to defendants and others on the ground to conduct survey and fix. the boundaries in pursuance of the Letter dt.06.12.2019 issued by the 6th Respondents on directions of the 3rd respondent herein is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of guidelines cf Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequently set aside the Letter dt.06.12.20..9 issued by the 6th re0ondent, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 6 in interfering with the peaceful possessor and enjoyment of the petitioner's land in Sy.No.19/2 to an extent of admeasuring 3298 sq.yards situated at Chinna Waltair Village, Pedda Waltair Area, Visakhapatnam District bounded by East - Land covered by Sy.No.6, West - Boundary wall of Andhra University Hostel, North - Land belong to Kalidindi Rama Devi and 40' feet GVMC Road connecting to 80' feet beach road, South - Land sold to defendants and others on the ground to conduct survey and fix. the boundaries in pursuance of the Letter dt.06.12.2019 issued by the 6th Respondents on directions of the 3rd respondent herein is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of guidelines of Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequently set aside the Letter dt.06.12.2019 issued by the 6th re0ondent, and pass ...”
3
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on oral instructions would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the parties and in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 16.03.2020, no further orders are necessary in this matter and this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 7079 of 2020
12.09.2025
Mjl /*